[IGA]

Identity Governance and Administration Solution and Integration

IDENT1TY designs, integrates, and operates your identity governance and administration (IGA) architecture: automated access reviews, certification campaigns, provisioning, and segregation of duties, so governance is real and audit ready, not just documented. As a vendor neutral integrator, we deploy the right IGA platform inside your environment.

The certificate lifecycle: from issuance to revocation

Identity governance and administration (IGA) is the discipline that controls who has access to what, why they have it, and when that access should end, across every system in an organization. It combines policy, workflow, and evidence so that access decisions can be requested, approved, reviewed, and audited throughout the identity lifecycle.

IGA is one part of the wider field of identity and access management (IAM). Where access management handles authentication, proving who a user is at the moment of login through SSO or MFA, IGA governs the harder question: should this identity hold this access at all, who approved it, and is it still appropriate today. It is the layer auditors care about most.

A modern IGA program rests on a recognizable set of capabilities: lifecycle automation (joiner, mover, leaver workflows), access certification campaigns, role management, segregation of duties enforcement, and audit ready reporting. The common thread is lifecycle: IGA tracks every access right from the moment it is granted to the moment it is revoked, and keeps the trail documented and justified in between.

IGA vs IAM vs PAM: how they differ

These three acronyms are often confused, but each governs a distinct layer of identity security.


IAM (identity and access management) is the overarching category for managing identities and their access. It controls authentication and authorization at the moment of access: who can sign in, with which credential, to which application.


IGA (identity governance and administration) is the governance layer inside IAM. It controls whether the access an identity holds is still appropriate over time: who reviewed it, who attested to it, when it expires, what triggers recertification, and how it gets deprovisioned.
PAM (privileged access management) secures the most sensitive accounts, the administrator and privileged identities that can change systems, by controlling, monitoring, and recording their access.


The simplest way to remember it: IAM decides who can log in, IGA decides whether they should still have that access, and PAM protects the powerful accounts. Most enterprises need all three. IAM without IGA produces orphaned accounts and standing privilege; IGA without IAM has no live access decisions to govern.

Why choose an IGA integrator over a single vendor

Most IGA vendors sell you a platform. The problem is that IGA fails far more often as an operating model than as a technology: programs collapse through unclear ownership, weak integration, and review fatigue, not because the software was wrong.


As a vendor neutral integrator, IDENT1TY solves the part that actually determines success. We design the governance operating model first, then integrate the right platform into your HRIS, directories, and business applications, and we run the access reviews, role modelling, and SoD rules so governance holds over time.


That means you get:

 

– An objective operating model built before the tooling, with clear ownership for provisioning, reviews, and offboarding.
– Deep integration across HRIS, Active Directory, cloud, and business applications, so governance covers the full estate.
– Role models built from real usage, not theory, and SoD rules enforced automatically to pass SOX, NIS2, DORA, and sector audits.

– A pure vendor optimizes for its license. An integrator optimizes for audits you pass and access you can actually explain.

Why most IGA projects fail?

Accumulated rights without control

Compliance violations, failed audits, undetected internal risks

Overly manual access reviews

Long and costly processes, human errors, non-scalable

Incomplete application integration

Silos persist, governance remains partial and ineffective

Identity governance without the complexity that makes it unusable

IGA projects often fail through operational overload.
IDENT1TY automates access reviews, certifications and provisioning workflows so governance is real, not just documented.

Automated access reviews

Certification campaigns launched automatically on your cycles (quarterly, annual). Managers validate in 2 clicks, anomalies surface as priorities.

Roles built from real usage

Role modelling through behavioural analysis of your existing users, not theory. Roles your teams understand and adopt.

Instant provisioning and de-provisioning

Onboarding, role change and departure automatically trigger the corresponding rights. Zero delay, zero oversight.

Built-in regulatory compliance

SoD (Segregation of Duties) natively configured with real-time alerts on rights conflicts. SOX, NIS2 and DORA audits made easier.

What we do today

We help organizations build clear, reliable and well-controlled governance of identities and access.

Governance · Entitlements · Compliance
01
Governance model
  • Definition of the governance model for identities, roles, responsibilities and associated processes
  • Implementation of management rules to control who accesses what, why and under whose authority
02
Rationalization and alignment
  • Rationalization of entitlements to reduce excessive rights, obsolete access and unmanaged accounts
  • Alignment of identity governance with business, security, compliance and audit requirements

We support our clients in setting up access review campaigns that are effective, readable and actionable by the business.

Recertification · Campaigns · Remediation
01
Design and automation
  • Design and automation of access rights recertification campaigns
  • Definition of review scopes by application, population, business role or risk level
02
Support and remediation
  • Support for managers, application owners and compliance teams during access validation
  • Identification of gaps, unjustified access or rights to be revoked, with tracking of remediation actions

We secure and industrialize the management of identities throughout their lifecycle within the enterprise.

Joiner · Mover · Leaver · Automation
01
JML automation
  • Automation of the Joiner, Mover and Leaver processes to ensure access is granted and revoked at the right time
  • Connection of HR, IT and business processes to make the creation, modification and removal of identities reliable
02
Assignment rules and risk reduction
  • Definition of access assignment rules based on functions, entities, roles or user profiles
  • Reduction of the risks tied to dormant accounts, persistent access and un-revoked rights

We help our clients identify, control and reduce the risks tied to sensitive entitlement conflicts.

SoD · Matrices · Internal control
01
Analysis and SoD matrices
  • Analysis of roles and rights to identify conflicts related to the separation of duties
  • Definition of SoD matrices tailored to business processes, critical applications and internal control requirements
02
Controls and remediation
  • Implementation of preventive and detective controls to limit high-risk access combinations
  • Production of risk reports and remediation plans actionable by security, audit and business teams

We integrate IGA solutions with HR, IT and application repositories to create coherent, automated governance.

HRIS · Connectors · Provisioning
01
HRIS and application connectivity
  • Connection to HRIS systems to make identity, joiner, leaver and role-change data reliable
  • Integration with business applications to govern access to the enterprise's critical systems
02
Workflows and synchronization
  • Implementation of connectors, workflows and provisioning rules tailored to client environments
  • Synchronization of data across IGA, IAM, PAM platforms, directories, ITSM and internal applications

We give organizations a clear, measurable and auditable view of their identities and access.

Dashboards · Audit · KPIs
01
Dashboards and audit evidence
  • Creation of dashboards and compliance reports on identities, access, reviews and risks
  • Production of audit evidence actionable by compliance, security, internal control and business teams
02
Key indicators and regulatory alignment
  • Tracking of key indicators: excessive rights, orphan access, review campaigns, SoD conflicts and remediations
  • Alignment of IGA controls with regulatory requirements, internal policies and security standards

Our numbers talk for us

28

years of experience

+100

Active Certifications

76

Projects deployed in 2025

17

Countries covered

+40

IAM/PAM/IGA certified experts

Use cases

IGAUniversal bank — Tier 1

Access review and recertification program

Industrialization of IGA campaigns and reduction of access debt across 800 applications.

18 months
15,000 employees · 800 applications
Windows · Linux · DB · Network

A European banking group whose semi-annual access review campaigns were deemed insufficient by the control functions. Managers were rubber-stamping without analysis, an issue flagged by both internal audit and the ACPR inspection.

The risk department wanted to regain control of the role model, which had become illegible through years of ad-hoc requests.

Undifferentiated mass validation creating a compliance risk
Several thousand technical roles with no clear business mapping
Accumulation of rights from past internal moves, never cleaned up
ACPR and European supervisor expectations on segregation of duties
01Complete redesign of the role model in collaboration with business teams to create readable, actionable roles
02Implementation of recertification campaigns targeted by risk level, with sensitive access reviewed quarterly
03Development of simplified review interfaces with business context to support managers' decisions
04Implementation of automatic SoD rules to block incompatible access combinations upstream
05Production of automated audit reports directly actionable by the ACPR and internal control teams
95% review campaign completion rate, versus under 60% previously
35% of excessive rights identified and revoked from the very first campaign with the new model
60% of technical roles consolidated or removed, with a role model finally readable by the business
SoD conflicts detected and blocked automatically, ending untraceable manual exceptions
ACPR report produced automatically for each campaign, with the compliance team's workload cut threefold
95%
Campaign completion rate
− 35%
Excessive rights revoked
− 60%
Non-business technical roles

Another use case, another challenge.

IGARetail — national chain

Automation of JML processes for a retail distributor

Day-zero provisioning, removal of orphan accounts and a smoother employee journey.

10 months
12,000 employees · High turnover
HRIS · AD · ERP · ITSM

A national retail chain heavily marked by seasonality and a high turnover rate. The provisioning process relied on manual tickets handled by several teams, with lead times ranging from 3 to 10 days.

Conversely, departures were only partially handled, leading to a large volume of orphan accounts.

Employees present in store with no access, forced to use their colleagues' credentials
No systematic deactivation process on departure
Two separate HRIS systems across subsidiaries with heterogeneous organizational models
Massive arrival peaks over very short windows during peak season
01Connectors to both HRIS systems with automatic reconciliation of identity data across subsidiaries
02Full automation of the Joiner process with provisioning triggered as soon as HR validates
03Implementation of the automated Leaver process, with immediate deactivation on the departure date recorded in the HRIS
04Scalable architecture able to absorb seasonal peaks without any degradation in lead times
05Automated monthly review of dormant accounts with progressive deactivation and manager notification
Day-zero provisioning for new joiners, with access available on the very first day in store
Near-zero persistent orphan accounts, with automatic deactivation on every departure
25% reduction in license costs thanks to the detection and deactivation of inactive accounts
Seasonal peaks absorbed with no support tickets, the process running fully autonomously
Harmonization of identity governance across both subsidiaries on a single model
Day 0
Provisioning for new joiners
≈ 0
Persistent orphan accounts
− 25%
License costs optimized

How Ident1ty works on your project IGA

Solution integrator

We deploy your IGA solution from A to Z.

Continuous Support & Managed Services

We maintain and optimize your IGA environment.

Success Plan

A dedicated CSM to support you.

Our technology partners

FAQ

Identity Governance and Administration FAQ

Clear answers on what IGA is, how it differs from IAM and PAM, and what a modern governance program covers.

If your access reviews still run on spreadsheets, these are the questions worth asking before your next audit.

What is identity governance and administration?
Identity governance and administration (IGA) is the discipline that controls who has access to what, why, and when that access should end. It combines policy, workflow, and evidence so access decisions can be reviewed, enforced, and audited across the identity lifecycle.
What is the difference between IGA and IAM?
IAM is the overarching category for managing identities and their access, and it handles authentication at the moment of login. IGA is the governance layer inside IAM that decides whether the access an identity already holds is still appropriate over time.
What is the difference between IGA and PAM?
IGA governs the access rights of all identities across their lifecycle, with reviews and certifications. PAM focuses specifically on securing, monitoring, and recording the most sensitive privileged and administrator accounts. Most enterprises need both.
What is an access certification campaign?
It is a periodic review in which managers or application owners confirm or revoke the access each user holds. Automated campaigns replace manual, spreadsheet based reviews and produce the evidence auditors require.
What is segregation of duties (SoD)?
Segregation of duties prevents one identity from holding conflicting permissions that could enable fraud, such as both requesting and approving a payment. IGA detects and blocks these toxic combinations automatically before access is granted.
Why do IGA projects fail?
Most IGA projects fail as an operating model, not a technology. Without clear ownership for provisioning, reviews, and offboarding, they devolve into manual exception handling. Success depends on defining the governance model before deploying the platform.

Your IGA Project deserves support from certified specialists.

Our consultants analyze your situation and guide you for free in 30 minutes.

FrançaisEnglish